News
Blogs
Variety



December 07, 2007

Ian Smith, 1919-2007

Prime Minister of Rhodesia

The Rt. Hon. Ian Douglas Smith, who died on November 20 (the same day as Franco), was born on April 8, 1919 in the farming and mining town of Selukwe, Rhodesia. The youngest of three children, his father was a Scottish butcher who moved to Rhodesia and became a cattle rancher and horse breeder. Smith attended the Chaplin School in Gwelo from 1930 to 1937, becoming Head Boy, as well as Captain of Rugby, Cricket, Athletics, Tennis, and Boxing.

In 1939, Great Britain declared war on Germany, and Ian Smith left the family farm to join the Royal Air Force. Commissioned a Lieutenant in 237 (Rhodesia) Squadron, a crash in North Africa in 1943 injured him so gravely that his face had to be reconstructed, giving him a very fixed look on one side of his face. In July 1944, he was shot down over Italy and evaded capture, linking up with Italian partisan guerrillas and eventually escaping to England to rejoin the RAF.

He returned to Rhodesia after the war, and in 1948 married Janet Watt, a widow with two children, Robert and Jean, with their own son Alex born a year later. In 1948, Smith also ran in the general election for the Legislative Assembly as a candidate for the Liberal Party (a party that was, as Lord Blake wrote in his History of Rhodesia, "in accordance with the Rhodesian tradition of adopting the most misleading political nomenclature possible").

"I was the youngest person ever to go into the Rhodesian parliament. I was twenty-nine years old. It so happened that in my little home town of Selukwe, which is a big mining camp, there were people who said 'Look, surely you don't expect us to vote for this chap Ian Smith. We remember him when he was in junior school here! And now you're asking me to accept him as my Member of Parliament?' Well it so happened that a few of my colleagues in the pub at the same time when the nominations had gone forward said 'You know, when he decided to go to fight the war for Britain, and that was a number of years ago, you didn't complain then, did you? What's your case now?' Well obviously they did not have a case and that pretty quickly scotched that one!"

In 1964, Prime Minister Winston Field resigned after the members of his party, the Rhodesian Front, felt he was unwilling to take on Britain in the fight for Rhodesian independence. (The British government was unwilling to grant Rhodesia dominion status unless a system of one-man, one-vote was instituted, a prospect considered anathema to Rhodesia's property-based electorate). Ian Smith, a member of the Rhodesian Front, was chosen to succeed Field as Prime Minister. A year later, in November 1965, Prime Minister Smith and the cabinet declared independence from Great Britain. "We have struck a blow," Smith told Rhodesia that day, "for the preservation of justice, civilization, and Christianity." The Declaration of Independence was signed and enacted at 11:00 London time, on November 11 — Remembrance Day — a time particularly chosen to remind Britain of the great sacrifices the people of Rhodesia had made to preserve Britain's independence in two world wars.

Smith led Rhodesia as Prime Minister for the next fifteen years, continuing the battle against the Communist terrorists whose ferocity only grew with each passing year. The economic sanctions leveled against Rhodesia by the United Nations had the reverse effect of encouraging internal investment and sparking a boom in the Rhodesian economy. The sanctions-busting smuggling of oil was the most difficult aspect of sanctions economically. But the governments of South Africa (then under apartheid) and Portuguese Moçambique (ruled by the Catholic dictator Antonio Salazar), while refusing to officially recognize Rhodesia were helpful in ensuring that the sanctions and embargo could be ignored.

For over ten years Rhodesia prospered, but towards the end of the 1970s, things began to change. Portugal's Salazar, who had been on such friendly terms with Smith, died in 1970, and Moçambique became independent in 1975 and immediately became a one-party state ruled by the Soviet-backed FRELIMO. While Rhodesia, South Africa, and the United States backed the RENAMO resistance movement in Moçambique, the Communist control of the important port of Lourenço Marques (now Maputo) made breaking the oil embargo much more difficult. Furthermore, South African Prime Minister John Vorster started a policy of engagement with that country's independent black-ruled neighbors in contrast to the previous policy of isolation. Wooing these countries, however, meant giving the cold shoulder to Rhodesia, and South African economic help trailed off.

Smith soon saw that the only way to prevent Rhodesia falling into the hands of the Communists was to compromise with the country's non-violent Black moderates, chief among them Methodist Bishop Abel Muzorewa. An agreement was worked out whereby power, once held by the overwhelmingly (but not completely) white property-qualified electorate, would now be shared by white and black Rhodesians alike. There would be an Assembly of 100 members: 72 elected by the non-racial common roll (i.e. universal adult suffrage), 20 elected from the non-racial property role (previously the only electorate, in which voters had to own a certain level of property), and the remaining 8 reserved for white members who would be selected by 92 elected members. A Senate would exist as an upper house: 10 members elected by the lower house, 5 members elected by the Mashonaland council of chiefs, 5 members elected by the Matabeleland council of chiefs, and the remaining members appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister.

In 1979, under the new settlement, a general election was held which international observers had confirmed as free and fair. Bishop Muzorewa and his moderate nationalist UANC party gained a majority of seats in the Assembly and so formed the government. Muzorewa became Prime Minister, and changed the name of the country to Zimbabwe-Rhodesia. Out of respect for the old leader and to include whites in the new government, Ian Smith was included in the Cabinet, though only as a Minister-without-portfolio.

The war against the Communists continued, albeit now under black leadership, but remarkably the international community refused to accept the compromise settlement and declined to recognize the new Republic of Zimbabwe-Rhodesia. Neither sanctions nor the oil embargo were lifted and thus the country still suffered an energy crisis. The British government under Thatcher forced Muzorewa to the bargaining table. Thatcher invited both Muzorewa and the Communist guerrillas (the Patriotic Front under Robert Mugabe) to participate in roundtable talks in London at Lancaster House.

It was agreed that Zimbabwe-Rhodesia would revert to its previous role as a British colony while elections could be held which were not restricted to non-violent parties. In exchange for being allowed to participate in these elections, the Patriotic Front agreed to abide by a cease-fire agreement, to renounce the use of force for political ends, to campaign peacefully and without intimidation, and to accept the outcome of the election. The black moderates and whites were assured that, should any party violate these strictures the Governor was bound to forbid them from standing in the elections. Predictably, Mugabe's guerrillas did not abide by a cease-fire, but engaged upon an active campaign of violent intimidation of the electorate. The British turned a blind eye, hoping to hold the elections and then "get out of Dodge" as soon as possible, handing over power to the victor.

Mugabe was declared the victor by a landslide and the rest is history.

THE DEATH OF Ian Smith struck me in particular as he was always a sort of hero to me. (I will always remember having his picture on my wall during my university days). He steered Rhodesia clear of both the stagnant racialist waters of South African-style apartheid as well as the destructive materialist waters of Communism and embraced a common-sense approach the chief aim of which was the preservation and advancement of peace and prosperity for the greatest number of Rhodesians. His deep love of his country was obvious, as he devoted his entire life to its service. But most of all, from all quarters, Ian Smith is continually hailed as a gentleman, and gentlemen are fewer and fewer in the realm of politics these days.

May God in His mercy grant eternal rest to the soul of Ian Douglas Smith, and may perpetual light shine upon him. Amen.

Posted by Andrew Cusack at December 7, 2007 08:24 PM
Comments

So long, Smithy. You did the world proud, even as the world betrayed you. We salute you for your decency and humanity, as well as your courage. May you rest in peace.

Posted by: The Monarchist
at December 7, 2007 11:59 PM


Yes, indeed, so long sir!

Something tells me that, though we need them more than ever, we shall not see his kind again; not until morning breaks upon our present darkness.

Posted by: Scott
at December 8, 2007 05:40 PM


Andrew
Nowhere in your appreciation of Ian Smith do you mention the saintly Irish Carmelite Bishop Donal Lamont who, after surviving an assasination attempt by government forces in Rhodesia, was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. Before being sentenced, Bishop Lamont wrote to Ian Smith: "Far from your policies defending Christianity and Western civilization, as you claim, they mock the law of Christ and make Communism attractive to the African people." If you want an example of a Christian gentleman, I can assure you from personal experience that you would do well to look at Bishop Lamont.

Posted by: Fr PF
at December 9, 2007 05:28 PM


In Africa, as in the rest of the world (during this period, and throughout the history of the Church) there have been clerics who put themselves on the same side as the enemies of the Church. Many are merely misguided (as Bishop Lamont), others completely intentional. I've no idea whether there were actual attempts on the Bishop's life by the government, but there were certainly dozens of Catholic missionaries killed by the guerillas (the St. Paul's Massacre comes to mind). The terrorists would sometimes even kill priests and nuns who had done nothing but give them aid and comfort, which shows their complete disdain for human life.

While I approach the claims of assassination attempts with natural skepticism, the fact that the Bishop only served 1/10th of the time he was sentenced (whether his breach of the law was just or not) and then deported hardly seems like the actions of a tyrannical regime.

Posted by: Robert Harrington
at December 9, 2007 07:07 PM


"His personal charm would give way to a scarcely controlled venom as he denounced white people and all aspects of colonial rule, while praising black leaders and their "freedom fighters"; he was accused of ignoring the freedom fighters' brutality towards innocent people, including priests and nuns.

---

he was particularly upset when the Catholic Justice and Peace Commission in Zimbabwe, which he had helped to found, felt obliged to expose the genocidal attacks on the people of Matabeleland in the 1980s."

from Bishop Lamont's Telegraph obit. It would appear that the Bishop made, shall we say, an error in judgment when deciding who was the freedom fighter and who the genocidal maniacs!

I'd take Ian Smith's paternalist conservatism over Bob Mugabe's murderous Marxism any day of the week!

Posted by: Liz S.
at December 9, 2007 07:15 PM


Ian Smith was a great guy, a defender of the western civilization.

Posted by: Lepante
at December 10, 2007 02:23 AM


I really mourn the passing of Ian Smith and other of his generation. Bloody minded perhaps, stuck in their ways, but above all heroic and just. Modern attitudes in Science and History tell us to look down upon humanity and trivialise it. To them I would say remember the gentlemen of the previous generation who sacrificed everything and died so that you might live.

Posted by: Humphrey Clarke
at December 10, 2007 05:48 AM


Ian Smith and his regime are partly responsible for the bad state of Zimbabwe today. If they had not continued with apartheid and instead reformed the country, teaching blacks how to become good managers and allowing back entrepreneurial-ship, Zimbabwe today would be a more economically viable place.

Posted by: David Airth
at December 10, 2007 11:20 AM


1) Apartheid was in South Africa, not Rhodesia.

2) If you actually read this article, you might be shocked to find that Ian Smith DID reform the country, helping to bring in a democratic mixed-race government.

3) Having good managers and entrepreneurs who are black is irrelevant when farms and business are confiscated by the state and distributed amongst ZANU-PF party hacks who are neither good managers nor entrepreneurs.

I think folks need to realize that rather than blaming Smith for Mugabe, we should blame MUGABE for Mugabe. If we have to blame someone other than Mugabe, then really it must be Lord Carrington for ignoring Mugabe's complete breach of the rules set down for the 1980 election.

Posted by: Robert Harrington
at December 10, 2007 11:30 AM


Well, I was going to respond to these comments, but it looks like Mr. Harrington and Miss Smith have done the work themselves!

Posted by: Andrew Cusack
at December 10, 2007 07:02 PM


Excellent post, Andrew!

I'm afraid Bishop Lamont sounds like an absolute monster. It's worth remembering of course that Mugabe himself was a creation of the Jesuit Order and of the British educational system (specifically the LSE). It's hardly surprising that there should be elements in both the Catholic Church and the British Establishment defaming the memory of Ian Smith and his achievements to this day.

And yes, Smith campaigned on a ticket of "a brighter, whiter Rhodesia".

Posted by: Oliver McCarthy
at December 26, 2007 12:37 PM


I am concerned that your paean to Ian Smith does not acknowledge the question of his alleged racism. (I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt in describing it as a case of alleged racism.)

I believe that as conservatives, we have an important obligation to deplore racism in any form, anywhere it is found, etc etc. This is in part due to the historic wrongs done in the name of racism, which some conservatives, due to their respect for tradition, were not vocal enough in opposing.

So while Ian Smith's rule in Rhodesia was in some respects admirable, especially in terms of maintaining order and a semblance of prosperity, we as conservatives should not overlook the fact that his outlook was based at least in part on a racist philosophy. Take this quote of Smith's from the NY Times' obituary: “The white man is master of Rhodesia. He has built it, and he intends to keep it.”

Again, as conservatives, I think we must acknowledge the moral wrongness of that statement. I agree that Rhodesia/Zimbabwe may have been materially better off under Smith's rule, but the racist foundation of that rule undermines its claims to any moral superiority.

And the question is not Smith or Mugabe, as if those are the only two options. Smith could have devoted himself from the beginning of his rule to fostering truly democratic institutions and taken steps towards incorporating moderate blacks into the government. Instead, he was committed to the maintainance of white rule in the country. If he had taken the former course, the rise of a demagogic tyrant like Mugabe might have been avoided. It also would have been the non-racist, morally correct approach to take.

Posted by: J. Fontane
at January 2, 2008 12:20 PM


Post a comment
PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING:

• Do not leave comments that are rude, unconstructive, tawdry, name-calling, or that constitute ad-hominem attacks.

• If you notice an inaccuracy or something in need of correction, please either post a comment or send an email.

• If you have complaints about the content, nature, style, or tone of this website, please desist from visiting it and maintain a safe distance.

At all times, remember that you are a guest on this site and behave accordingly.







Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam




Charles of Austria,
Pray for Us!
About
More or less, the musings of a 24-year-old New Yorker, a graduate of the University of St Andrews in Scotland, currently resident in his native County of Westchester. [MORE]
Recommended
Maces of America
A series of post covering the history, design, and use of ceremonial maces in the United States.

I: The University of the South
II: The City of Norfolk
III: The South Carolina House of Representatives
IV: The Virginia House of Delegates
Contact
andrewcusack@yahoo.com

I regret not being able to respond to all messages and inquiries.