Hitchcock in Québec

Those photos convey very well the deeply film noir style of the cinematography which Hitchcock employed. Despite the grandeur of the location, the film has that quite dark and mysterious feel to it.

Thanks for sharing the photos.

I wouldn't say they look particularly noirish. Black and white, sure. But a distinct absence of shadow, surely the key visual component in film noir.

Ace film, though.

Interesting that he makes Hannay in 39 Steps a Canadian, too (as opposed to a South African in the book).

You've certainly struck something here, Andrew. One thing Hitch is admired for is his ability to convey a strong sense of place in his films. Most notably in "Vertigo" (San Francisco) & "Shadow of a Doubt" (small town America -- by the way, this film was his personal favorite, & is mine, too).

I haven't seen "I Confess" but your wonderful post makes me want to rush out & find it right now. Many thanks.

This is my favorite of Hitchcock's films. It reveals that his understanding of the Faith, and even of the priesthood, was deep and sure. The ending is unforgetable and moving, particularly, I would have thought, for a priest. Montgomery Clift is superb, and, as you rightly point out, the dark amd sombre side of Quebec is beautifully evoked.

Terrific film. Gorgeous city. I spent a week there as a 4 year-old in that hotel in your first shot. I befriended a handsome cab horse and kept slipping away to visit him. I can still recall my father storming down the street looking for me only to find me sitting in on the box, chatting with the driver and holding the reins. When he saw me, all I did was look at him and ask with big eyes "What?"...

The crucifix behind the speaker's desk in the Quebec parliament is the result of a somewhat recent (before the late '60's) attempt by the provincial premier to make Catholicism something like a state religion. As would be expected with cramming an already well-received Faith down the peoples' throats, (follwed by late 60's cultural fallout) Quebec went from 90% observance of the Faith to a mere 10%.
State religion would be a fine thing if the results in history had been more positive. The State seems to win all the time.

It's always bad when the state takes on the responsibility for something naturally taken care of by individuals and non-state organisations. Witness the destruction of the family throughout Europe. Witness also the NHS.

Great film. The only story I know of that hinges on that awesome thing, the Seal of Confession.

The union of state and Catholicism (i.e., Truth) was an excellent thing. It gave us Western Civilization.

I've never seen the film, but I've been to the old fortified city (the second oldest in North America) on many occasions. Suffice it to say, it is this country's most charming and historic town, coming as it does right out of the Old World; though Imperial Victoria comes close in its own way, as does Colonial Kingston and the majesty and grandeur of parts of Ottawa.

Signore Dino I am sorry to disagree, but what produced Western Civilization was not the union of Catholicism and the State. The State as we know it did not exist in the wee hours of Christendom. FWIW, I doubt that even "Catholicism" existed then, but The Church -- the extension of the Resurrected Christ into time and space -- NOT a department of the State which until recently mainly operated to keep the rabble in line.

What is necessary, then, is not really the union of the state and Catholicism but of society and the Church. Christianity should be the religion of the state because it is the religion of the people, not the other way round. While requiring much more work, making Catholicism the religion of the people would do us much more good than simply passing legislative fiats declaring it the religion of the state.

Crucifixes should be in the public sphere not only because they reflect the splendor of Truth but also as a reflection of Christian society, not merely by governmental decree. To the best of my knowledge, there were no declarations in pre-reformation England that the Church was the state religion, it simply informed all aspects of society and so this did not even need to be formally enunciated. That is Western civilization in all its glory!

Well said, Andrew.

It seems to me that to formally make one religion the religion of "the state" would perforce make members/followers of other religions "outlaws" so to speak. But if the predominant religion comes to inform all aspects of a society, not through law or formal decree, but through heartfelt belief & sincere daily practice by the people, the religion itself is honored in a much more beautiful, indeed glorious, way.

Sorry, gents. You can't have a society without government, and a society in which the majority are Catholic will naturally establish that government (like all things) in Christ and His Church. Here's Leo XIII in his encyclical Immortale Dei.

21. There was once a time when States were governed by the philosophy of the Gospel. Then it was that the power and divine virtue of Christian wisdom had diffused itself throughout the laws, institutions, and morals of the people, permeating all ranks and relations of civil society. Then, too, the religion instituted by Jesus Christ, established firmly in befitting dignity, flourished everywhere, by the favour of princes and the legitimate protection of magistrates; and Church and State were happily united in concord and friendly interchange of good offices. The State, constituted in this wise, bore fruits important beyond all expectation, whose remembrance is still, and always will be, in renown, witnessed to as they are by countless proofs which can never be blotted out or ever obscured by any craft of any enemies. Christian Europe has subdued barbarous nations, and changed them from a savage to a civilized condition, from superstition to true worship. It victoriously rolled back the tide of Mohammedan conquest; retained the headship of civilization; stood forth in the front rank as the leader and teacher of all, in every branch of national culture; bestowed on the world the gift of true and many-sided liberty; and most wisely founded very numerous institutions for the solace of human suffering. And if we inquire how it was able to bring about so altered a condition of things, the answer is-beyond all question, in large measure, through religion, under whose auspices so many great undertakings were set on foot, through whose aid they were brought to completion.

I just watched 'I confess', an excellent film indeed. The cinematography was classic Hitchcock, long silent scenes, where you have only the expression of the characters to go on.