Wednesday 17 September 2014
CONTACT | RSS
ABOUT | CATEGORIES | PAGINATED INDEX
Based in London; Formerly of New York, Buenos Aires, Fife, and the Western Cape. Saoránach d'Éirinn.
About
A writer, blogger, and historian, born in New York, educated in Argentina, Scotland, and South Africa, now based in London. read more
Links
Blogs
Reviews & Periodicals
Church
Arts & Design
Scotland
Africa
Cape of Good Hope
France
Netherlands
Mitteleuropa
Scandinavia
Muscovy
India
Argentina
The Levant
Knickerbockers
Academica

Ireland needs an undeniably world-class university

NOT A SINGLE Irish university made it into the top 100 of the Times Higher Education World University Rankings this year, but reviving an old proposal might give Ireland more global clout in the academic sphere. While all rankings systems are on some level arbitrary, the THE takes into account the views of over 17,000 academics across the planet and gives us an insight into how institutions — and by extension their host countries — are perceived not only in academia but also in the perhaps more lucrative field of research and development.

Being pushed out of the top 100 doesn’t necessarily indicate that higher education in Ireland is in any crisis; it could merely reflect the comparative rise of other institutions in countries which are beginning to appreciate the value of academic research and institutional prestige. But a country shouldn’t rest on its laurels, and it’s worth asking: Is Ireland missing an opportunity to have a university of unquestionable world-class status?

Reflecting on the 2012 THE rankings, political commentator Richard Waghorne suggested via Twitter that it is high time that University College Dublin, Trinity, and Dublin City University were amalgamated into the University of Dublin. This is an idea with a long heritage which, even if it is to be rejected, needs to be considered seriously.

One could argue it goes back to the ‘Irish university question’ of the nineteenth century, but the first concrete proposal came in 1967 when the Fianna Fáil minister of education, Donogh O’Malley, announced the government’s intention to merge Trinity and UCD into a new, single, multi-denominational university. Each college was to have equal representation on the university senate, but the total property of both were to be transferred to the central body, undermining collegiate autonomy. With O’Malley’s sudden death, the plan was continued by his successor as minister, Brian Lenihan Snr.

Somewhat surprisingly, the governing body of Trinity were initially receptive (perhaps hoping to charm the Minister into retaining a stronger college structure) but opposition from students and academics alike grew on both campuses. Indeed, the colourful Lenihan, faced with a strident gang of protestors at Trinity, was said to have made a judicious escape through the window of a gent’s loo. Government enthusiasm faded as other matters took priority, and the merger was eventually laid to rest.

Much more recently, in 2010, we heard Peter Sutherland SC, the former attorney-general, advancing a TCD/UCD/DCU merger at a Royal Irish Academy event. “Ireland cannot afford to keep seven universities at world-class research, education, and training levels,” Sutherland argued, provoking a flurry of comments.

Ferdinand von Prondzynski, the president who put DCU on the map, retorted that there is “very little empirical evidence” to suggest a particular number of universities is appropriate to a particular country, while offering that evidence did suggest “maintaining high levels of quality is easier in smaller universities than in large ones”.

What, though, should an amalgamated TCD/UCD/DCU look like? First, a new university should not be created from nothing when an ancient one already exists: the University of Dublin. DU currently only has one college, Trinity, and very few people have any real conception of the difference between the University and the College. Yet in Trinity’s own founding statutes from 1592, it was already envisioned that the college would be the “mother of a university”, and bringing UCD and DCU into the University of Dublin alongside Trinity would be the fulfilment of a vision long established. Furthermore, DU is Ireland’s oldest university and this heritage would grant respect and dignity to an expanded university without preventing it from being cutting-edge.

Second, these three constituent colleges should maintain a great deal of autonomy and independence of spirit. This would have the advantage of preserving Trinity’s preeminent brand while encouraging an element of friendly rivalry and competition between colleges — something Oxford and Cambridge both enjoy. The cocky television academic Niall Ferguson has proffered that Europe’s pre-eminence came from its ability to maintain a suitable diversity in which different parts competed with each other and prioritised innovation in the process. Finding the right balance between cooperation and competition will, however, be difficult.

Thirdly, such a merger should not be a reductive cost-cutting measure. Rising institutional debt provides neither a sufficient nor appropriate grounds for merging these three places of learning, and the result would be little more than a shotgun wedding leaving all parties dissatisfied. Such an inauspicious creation would undermine the institutional confidence that the University of Dublin would need to thrive on the world stage. Ireland must believe it deserves a great university and be willing (on both a public and private) level to invest in it accordingly.

Finally, an expanded, world-class University of Dublin should be achieved by mutual respect and consent. The 1960s attempt exposed the errors of merger by government fiat. It should be a voluntary process over the course of perhaps a decade, accelerating or slowing down in accordance with the comfort of the involved partners.

“Suggesting that universities might have to merge or be closed makes them defensive and suspicious, just as they should be opening up to closer collaboration with others,” Dr von Prondzynski argues. “So the best thing we can do is probably to ignore such calls (and hope that others do, too) and get on with the agenda of strategic collaboration.”

Increasing “strategic collaboration” between institutions, then, should be the immediate priority. If that works out, then and only then can we maturely begin to lay the foundations of an expanded University of Dublin. Without that preliminary step, different institutional cultures will likely clash and collide — breaking rather than bending — leading to pressure to maintain the status quo.

Size or shape aren’t the ultimate point of this coming-together, but ensuring that Ireland has an undeniably world-class university for the education of our young and the expansion of human knowledge.

“In the end,” von Prondzynski concludes, “it is quality that counts.”

This post was published on Wednesday, August 1st, 2012 9:00 am. It has been categorised under Ireland and been tagged under , , .
Comments
  1. Bridget
    1 August 2012
    9:42 pm

    What an appalling idea. Not the merging of the Dublin institutions, although where the departure of UCD might leave the rest of the NUI you don’t say, but the idea that something needs to be done to meet the debased standards which are the “Rankings.” Voegelin is right in hesitating to speak even of an indifference to education when visions of prestige fill empty heads.

     CLASSIC:  The feeling of existential unrest, the desire to know, the feeling of being moved to question, the questioning and seeking itself, the direction of the questioning toward the ground that moves to be sought, the recognition of the divine ground as the mover, are the experiential complex, the pathos , in which the reality of divine-human participation ( metalepsis ) becomes luminous. The exploration of the metaleptic reality, of the Platonic metaxy , as well as the articulation of the exploratory action through language symbols, in Plato’s case of his myths, are the central concern of the philosopher’s efforts. 

    MODERN: The modern responses to this central issue change with the “climate of opinion”. . . . Philosophical illiteracy has progressed so far that the experiential core of philosophizing has disappeared below the horizon and is not even recognized as such when it appears in philosophers like Bergson. The deculturation process has eclipsed it so thoroughly by opinion that sometimes one hesitates to speak even of an indifference toward it.

    CLASSIC: Education is the art of periagoge , of turning around (Plato).  

    MODERN:  Education is the art of adjusting people so solidly to the climate of opinion prevalent at the time that they feel no “desire to know.” Education is the art of preventing people from acquiring the knowledge that would enable them to articulate the questions of existence. Education is the art of pressuring young people into a state of alienation that will result in either quiet despair or aggressive militancy.

  2. Skirmish
    2 August 2012
    10:56 am

    World-class twaddle. The fetish for leagues is anti-education and anti-knowledge. It’s put out by people who watch too many Ivy League movies and who think universities are grant-generating brands. ‘Visions of prestige’ filling empty heads indeed.
    Ireland has a population of 4 million or so. Should we also build ‘world-class’ battleships? Take on Boeing? Develop a space programme?
    There is a substantive discussion to be had about massive underfunding in education, rather than salivating pathetically over futile and (deliberately?) distracting merger dances.

  3. L Gaylord clark
    2 August 2012
    6:53 pm

    The late Gore Vidal put his finger on it when he referred contemptuously (as was his wont) to “scholar- squirrels”; that is, to professors interested far less in knowledge as enlightenment than in unreadable books and articles written merely to reach quotas and earn tenure.
    Amalgamate? Close them all down and start anew.

  4. 7 August 2012
    12:33 am

    The first attempt to expand the University of Dublin beyond the confines of the Society of the Most Holy and Undivided Trinity near Dublin aka Trinity College was in 1826. The quid pro quo for the abolition of the lay academy at Maynooth was the foundation of a Catholic college at the University of Dublin… we’re still waiting for that, as it happens! In any event, there is no legal distinction between the University and the College at TCD; a judgement of the judicial committee of the Irish Privy Council put paid to the College of a Universit hypothesis in the early 1900s.

  5. 18 August 2012
    6:01 am

    Feels like a Trump-run ‘Miss World’ contest. Rankings are filth.At best, actual study seems an afterthought in the indexes. Ireland will endure.

Leave a comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Comment

Home | About | Contact | Categories | Paginated Index | Twitter | Facebook | RSS/Atom Feed
andrewcusack.com | © Andrew Cusack 2004-present (Unless otherwise stated)