<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ‘The Tolstoy of Transylvania’</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewcusack.com/2010/01/12/miklos-banffy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2010/01/12/miklos-banffy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:19:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie Moncelon</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2010/01/12/miklos-banffy/comment-page-1/#comment-27296</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie Moncelon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/?p=8797#comment-27296</guid>
		<description>I give my salute and thanks for the post of Baron von Hetterscheidt, whom pensées are completely in conformity with mines. I&#039;m glad to read that, because such énoncés are so few written on public pages. Sorry for my bad english.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give my salute and thanks for the post of Baron von Hetterscheidt, whom pensées are completely in conformity with mines. I&#8217;m glad to read that, because such énoncés are so few written on public pages. Sorry for my bad english.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary O'Regan</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2010/01/12/miklos-banffy/comment-page-1/#comment-26059</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary O'Regan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/?p=8797#comment-26059</guid>
		<description>Dear Andrew Cusack, 
This is my first reading of your blog - well done - it&#039;s both fascinating and entertaining. 
I know a devout Cathoic in London, the city in which I reside. This &#039;devout Catholic&#039; speaks fluent Hungarian. The Hungarian government commended him for his fluency. I will give him the word about this blog post &#039;next time I see him in Corpus Christi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Andrew Cusack,<br />
This is my first reading of your blog &#8211; well done &#8211; it&#8217;s both fascinating and entertaining.<br />
I know a devout Cathoic in London, the city in which I reside. This &#8216;devout Catholic&#8217; speaks fluent Hungarian. The Hungarian government commended him for his fluency. I will give him the word about this blog post &#8216;next time I see him in Corpus Christi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baron v Hetterscheidt</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2010/01/12/miklos-banffy/comment-page-1/#comment-26035</link>
		<dc:creator>Baron v Hetterscheidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/?p=8797#comment-26035</guid>
		<description>A caveat: the old order did not end with the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand, as deplorable and catastrophic an event as that was. It ended with the defeat of the Central Powers. 
Had they won, then the old order would have continued right up until today. No Hitler, no Stalin, no Labour governments in Britain, a likely restoration of the monarchy in France; the list is endless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A caveat: the old order did not end with the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand, as deplorable and catastrophic an event as that was. It ended with the defeat of the Central Powers.<br />
Had they won, then the old order would have continued right up until today. No Hitler, no Stalin, no Labour governments in Britain, a likely restoration of the monarchy in France; the list is endless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan Novillo Astrada</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2010/01/12/miklos-banffy/comment-page-1/#comment-26004</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Novillo Astrada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/?p=8797#comment-26004</guid>
		<description>Dear Andrew, 
Unfortunately we cannot see the comments properly.
Thanks, Juan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Andrew,<br />
Unfortunately we cannot see the comments properly.<br />
Thanks, Juan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Cusack</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2010/01/12/miklos-banffy/comment-page-1/#comment-26000</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Cusack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/?p=8797#comment-26000</guid>
		<description>There are more Hapsburgian writers than Banffy (who was a Protestant after all). Joseph Roth, for example (an Austrian Jewish Catholic), known for his novel &lt;i&gt;The Radetzky March&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are more Hapsburgian writers than Banffy (who was a Protestant after all). Joseph Roth, for example (an Austrian Jewish Catholic), known for his novel <i>The Radetzky March</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Reese</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2010/01/12/miklos-banffy/comment-page-1/#comment-25993</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Reese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/?p=8797#comment-25993</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this post; I was just bemoaning my lack of familiarity with Hapsburg literature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this post; I was just bemoaning my lack of familiarity with Hapsburg literature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Cusack</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2010/01/12/miklos-banffy/comment-page-1/#comment-25991</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Cusack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/?p=8797#comment-25991</guid>
		<description>I have no comments to give on that subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no comments to give on that subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2010/01/12/miklos-banffy/comment-page-1/#comment-25988</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/?p=8797#comment-25988</guid>
		<description>This is entirely unrelated to this subject.
I am wondering if you, as a young man of erudition and sophistication, would give us your comments on the notorious Mrs Iris Robinson of Belfast?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is entirely unrelated to this subject.<br />
I am wondering if you, as a young man of erudition and sophistication, would give us your comments on the notorious Mrs Iris Robinson of Belfast?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

