<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film of the Year: &#8220;Zwartboek&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewcusack.com/2007/08/08/film-of-the-year-zwartboek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2007/08/08/film-of-the-year-zwartboek/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:00:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Old Dominion Tory</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2007/08/08/film-of-the-year-zwartboek/comment-page-1/#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Dominion Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/net/2007/08/08/film-of-the-year-zwartboek/#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>As I recall, &quot;Soldier of Orange&quot; did have some dodgy bits, mainly dealing with the main character&#039;s considerable sexual appetite.
However, like Mr. Cusack, I recall a distinct monarchical tone--e.g., as in when HM Queen Wilhemlina sends a message to the Dutch Underground and the fact that the Dutch warmly welcome her back to her palace.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall, &#8220;Soldier of Orange&#8221; did have some dodgy bits, mainly dealing with the main character&#8217;s considerable sexual appetite.<br />
However, like Mr. Cusack, I recall a distinct monarchical tone&#8211;e.g., as in when HM Queen Wilhemlina sends a message to the Dutch Underground and the fact that the Dutch warmly welcome her back to her palace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz S.</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2007/08/08/film-of-the-year-zwartboek/comment-page-1/#comment-1604</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/net/2007/08/08/film-of-the-year-zwartboek/#comment-1604</guid>
		<description>Rob&#039;s the same way! We&#039;ll see a movie he recommends and I&#039;ll say &quot;That had some horrible scenes!&quot; and he just brushes it aside, &quot;Oh yes, but you just forget about those.&quot; Perhaps its my feminine instinct as moral guardian, but one does NOT forget such things!

I think because it&#039;s obligatory to have, hmmm, &quot;dodgy&quot; scenes in any film, you&#039;ve just learned to cast them aside and then selectively remember films for their better parts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob&#8217;s the same way! We&#8217;ll see a movie he recommends and I&#8217;ll say &#8220;That had some horrible scenes!&#8221; and he just brushes it aside, &#8220;Oh yes, but you just forget about those.&#8221; Perhaps its my feminine instinct as moral guardian, but one does NOT forget such things!</p>
<p>I think because it&#8217;s obligatory to have, hmmm, &#8220;dodgy&#8221; scenes in any film, you&#8217;ve just learned to cast them aside and then selectively remember films for their better parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Cusack</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2007/08/08/film-of-the-year-zwartboek/comment-page-1/#comment-1603</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Cusack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 22:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/net/2007/08/08/film-of-the-year-zwartboek/#comment-1603</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... are they? I hadn&#039;t noticed. Perhaps I&#039;ve just mastered the skill of mentally erasing all the dodgy bits.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; are they? I hadn&#8217;t noticed. Perhaps I&#8217;ve just mastered the skill of mentally erasing all the dodgy bits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L Gaylord Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2007/08/08/film-of-the-year-zwartboek/comment-page-1/#comment-1602</link>
		<dc:creator>L Gaylord Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/net/2007/08/08/film-of-the-year-zwartboek/#comment-1602</guid>
		<description>Cusack, you surprise me. Both films, although admittedly old-fashioned in style, are deeply anti-traditional. They mock religion, monarchy, and hierarchy. &#039;Blackbook&#039; in particular is sexually depraved.
How could you?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cusack, you surprise me. Both films, although admittedly old-fashioned in style, are deeply anti-traditional. They mock religion, monarchy, and hierarchy. &#8216;Blackbook&#8217; in particular is sexually depraved.<br />
How could you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
