That’s odd… no?

Perhaps you should have read the post in its entirety; I direct your attention to the final paragraph.

That’s odd… no?

In this age of globalism, multi-culturalism, & multi-national corporatism, tolerance as an ideal may be a necessity, but toleranace of fanaticism, religious or otherwise, is foolhardy, & perhaps all too often the result of convenience rather than wisdom.

“We are being challenged by Islam these years. Globally as well as locally. There is something impressive about people for whom religion imbues their existence, from dusk to dawn, from cradle to grave. There are also Christians who feel this way. There is something endearing about people who give themselves up completely to their faith. But there is likewise something frightening about such a totality, which also is a feature of Islam. A counterbalance has to be found, and one has to, at times, run the risk of having unflattering labels placed on you. For there are some things for which one should display no tolerance. And when we are tolerant, we must know whether it is because of convenience or conviction.”

Amen!