<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recent Floridian Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewcusack.com/2006/03/24/recent-floridian-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2006/03/24/recent-floridian-architecture/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:53:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Abeln</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2006/03/24/recent-floridian-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Abeln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/net/2006/03/24/recent-floridian-architecture/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

This is similar to &lt;b&gt;New Town - Saint Charles&lt;/b&gt;, being built in suburban Saint Louis, Missouri—on the &lt;i&gt;floodplain&lt;/i&gt; of the huge and dangerous Missouri River.  Oh, I&#039;m sure they have the best of engineering to protect these fine new homes.

This community will also have a non-denominational chapel in its center.  In the United States, the term &#039;non-denominational&#039; has notional overtones that go from benign to sinister—in middle of the last century, the Ku Klux Klan was the major force in the non-denom movement.  Nowadays we have both left- and right-wing versions of &#039;emerging churches&#039; that are quite un-Catholic in their Christianity, but are wildly popular: these non-denom ecclesial communites are instead explicitly Post-modern.

The &lt;b&gt;New Urbanism&lt;/b&gt; theory inspiring these new towns fails to recognize the Catholic roots of urban design and instead is based on Existentialism.  I like these new communities better than the standard tract developments, but I am more comfortable with the Catholic parish neighborhoods of the City of Saint Louis.

It&#039;s a good start, but we can do better, I think.

Best regards,

Mark S. Abeln
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>This is similar to <b>New Town &#8211; Saint Charles</b>, being built in suburban Saint Louis, Missouri—on the <i>floodplain</i> of the huge and dangerous Missouri River.  Oh, I&#8217;m sure they have the best of engineering to protect these fine new homes.</p>
<p>This community will also have a non-denominational chapel in its center.  In the United States, the term &#8216;non-denominational&#8217; has notional overtones that go from benign to sinister—in middle of the last century, the Ku Klux Klan was the major force in the non-denom movement.  Nowadays we have both left- and right-wing versions of &#8216;emerging churches&#8217; that are quite un-Catholic in their Christianity, but are wildly popular: these non-denom ecclesial communites are instead explicitly Post-modern.</p>
<p>The <b>New Urbanism</b> theory inspiring these new towns fails to recognize the Catholic roots of urban design and instead is based on Existentialism.  I like these new communities better than the standard tract developments, but I am more comfortable with the Catholic parish neighborhoods of the City of Saint Louis.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good start, but we can do better, I think.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Mark S. Abeln</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liturgical Disorder</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2006/03/24/recent-floridian-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liturgical Disorder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 02:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/net/2006/03/24/recent-floridian-architecture/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://spaces.msn.com/liturgicaldisorder/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://spaces.msn.com/liturgicaldisorder/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://spaces.msn.com/liturgicaldisorder/" rel="nofollow">http://spaces.msn.com/liturgicaldisorder/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2006/03/24/recent-floridian-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/net/2006/03/24/recent-floridian-architecture/#comment-194</guid>
		<description>yes less the church have no real signifigance
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes less the church have no real signifigance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcusack.com/2006/03/24/recent-floridian-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 07:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcusack.com/net/2006/03/24/recent-floridian-architecture/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>The chapel does seem a bit bare. It ought to be dolled up a bit. And while they&#039;re at it, the locals ought all to convert to Catholicism, too.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chapel does seem a bit bare. It ought to be dolled up a bit. And while they&#8217;re at it, the locals ought all to convert to Catholicism, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
